Company & Industry

MRP II in Practice at Solimpeks

MRP II integrates planning, scheduling, inventory and capacity analysis into one platform — and at Solimpeks it underpins real-time visibility from component sourcing to assembly across solar thermal, PV-T, heat pump and storage tank product lines. Implementation lives or dies on data accuracy, legacy integration and change management; the optimization levers that work are simulation-based scheduling, automated shop-floor data collection, machine-learning analytics and lean principles layered on top.

MRP II in Practice at Solimpeks

Manufacturing Resource Planning II (MRP II) integrates planning, scheduling, inventory management and capacity analysis into a single platform — and for a renewable-energy manufacturer, that integration is what keeps complex product lines synchronized with real demand. At Solimpeks, MRP II functions have long been part of our ERP backbone — first on Canias ERP and, since 1 August 2026, on Firmanet ERP — giving us real-time visibility across production stages, from component sourcing to assembly, which is how we minimize waste, align production with sales forecasts and manage supply-chain complexity across our solar thermal, PV-T, heat pump and storage tank product lines — from collectors such as PVT hybrids to buffer tanks and cylinders.

What makes MRP II implementation hard?

Three things undermine most MRP II projects. The first is data accuracy: the system is only as good as its inputs, and inaccurate data produces flawed schedules, inventory shortfalls and missed deliveries — a leading contributor to project failure. The second is legacy integration: decades-old platforms rarely speak modern MRP II architectures, forcing costly customization, and unresolved data silos or redundant manual processes can quietly negate the system's benefits. The third is supply-chain complexity: coordinating multiple sites, vendors and regulatory environments means supplier unpredictability and transport issues trigger constant rescheduling and excess inventory unless the system is configured for diverse scenarios.

None of these are purely technical problems. They demand stakeholder engagement, training, data governance and a robust integration framework — organizational work as much as IT work.

Which optimization strategies actually work?

| Lever | How it works | Payoff | |---|---|---| | Simulation-based scheduling | Digital twins of the production process test scenarios without touching live operations | Bottlenecks found before they happen; faster adaptation | | Automated data management | IIoT feeds shop-floor equipment data straight into MRP II | Accurate real-time inventory, fewer manual errors | | Advanced analytics | Machine learning on historical production data predicts demand and optimizes order quantities | Less waste, lower operational cost | | Lean + MRP II | Kaizen-style continuous improvement driven by actual shop-floor data | Ongoing efficiency and flexibility gains |

Simulation deserves emphasis: being able to visualize a scheduling change in a digital twin before committing the real line to it converts planning from reactive firefighting into proactive design.

What have we learned from implementation?

The honest lesson from our own MRP II deployment is that the technology was not the deciding factor. Cross-department collaboration and ongoing staff training were, because they are what keep data entry accurate and workflows disciplined. MRP II performs best treated as a holistic business initiative, not an IT rollout. We are applying the same lesson in our move to Firmanet ERP, which went live on 1 August 2026, with our teams preparing their data and workflows ahead of go-live so that digital planning keeps improving without disrupting production.

External experience points the same way: companies that succeed with MRP II consistently credit change management, user training and continuous performance monitoring. The recurring pitfalls across the industry are equally consistent — dirty data, weak change management and disengaged users. Iterative feedback and regular system audits are what sustain the gains.

Where is MRP II heading next?

AI and machine learning are making demand forecasting and scheduling genuinely adaptive; cloud platforms give multi-site operations real-time shared access and clean ERP/IoT integration; and digital twins keep lowering the cost of experimentation. For our own roadmap, the priorities follow directly: invest in AI-driven analytics to spot patterns and anticipate bottlenecks, expand cloud infrastructure to support international growth, extend IoT and digital-twin coverage for scenario planning, and keep training the team in data analytics and digital manufacturing.

The destination is a planning system that learns — one that keeps a renewable-energy product portfolio flexible without sacrificing the discipline that makes flexibility affordable.

MRP II production planning manufacturing digital twin lean production
About the Author

Production planning & MES

Share
in Ig f